On November 29, the Monday after Thanksgiving, the US Senate has a chance to bring about a major improvement in the safety of the nation’s food by passing S 510, the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act. But although many in the food industry, along with consumers, support the bill, there are still some parts of the industry that don’t want the bill to pass. We can’t let them win.
Food safety reform has been a long time coming. FDA currently operates under rules that haven’t been updates since 1938, and we’ve seen graphic examples of how the law is not up to modern challenges. Four years ago e coli 0157:H7- contaminated spinach from a field in California was distributed nationwide, resulting in three deaths and hundreds of serious illnesses. Then two years ago Peanut Corporation of America shipped salmonella-contaminated peanut products that ultimately caused nine deaths. This year the discovery of salmonella in eggs and filthy conditions at the henhouses that produced them triggered a recall of half a BILLION eggs. The House finally passed a major food safety reform bill in the summer of 2009. The Senate voted its version out of committee in the fall of 2009, but then proved unable to get further.
However at almost the eleventh hour, it looks as though food safety reform actually could pass. Last week it cleared some procedural hurdles. Majority Leader Harry Reid scheduled a vote on whether to allow the bill to be brought to the Senate floor, and it passed by 74-25 (see how your Senators voted here), receiving bipartisan support, something almost unheard of in Washington today. Concerns of small farmers and processors, who worried that the bill might saddle them with new paperwork requirements they could not afford, were addressed in an amendment proposed by Senators Tester and Hagan, as well as by changes proposed by Senators Sanders, Bennet and Stabenow. After some modifications sought by consumer groups to insure that the amendment didn’t unacceptably undermine public health, the Tester-Hagen amendment was incorporated in the “manager’s amendment”. That’s final version of the bill that will actually be brought to a vote.
Most encouraging of all, last Friday, the Republican and Democratic leadership agreed on a time period for debate and a series of votes on amendments and on the bill itself to be held Monday November 29. There will be a “cloture” vote on ending debate on the bill, which must pass by 60 votes and, if that passes, a final vote on S 510.
Those votes on Monday will be critical. If more than 60 Senators vote again in support of food safety, as they did last week, the bill will get through. It is likely that the House would then also quickly pass the Senate version of the bill and it will be signed by President Obama in to law.
Some segments of the food industry however still oppose the bill and will be spending their Thanksgiving doing everything they can to persuade Senators in their states to change their mind and vote no. If there is a “no” vote on the 29th, the bill dies in this Congress. Those who think we can do better on food safety will have to start over from Square One.
We can’t let that happen. Eric Schlosser and Michael Pollan, who advocated so eloquently for a safety and more sustainable food production system in the movie Food Inc, recently indicated their strong support for the bill. They said: “S. 510 is the most important food safety legislation in a generation. The Tester amendment will make it even more effective… We both think this is the right thing to do.”
So do we. Everyone who cares about a safe and sustainably grown food should contact their Senators now, and tell them to make sure they come back to Washington promptly after Thanksgiving so that on Monday November 29 they can vote YES on S 510, the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act.
Not in My Food.org : Know what you're eating







This is awful. The last thing we need is the government taking more control after faking the egg scare. They don’t even enforce the policies they have now. And this bill will be used to oppress small farmers. When the big factory farms get to do whatever they’d like, with just a slap on the wrist, they will poison us all.
It is very important to get this bill passed. please for our healths sake
please pass this bill for all our healths sake
This bill is NOT about food safety. It is about eliminating sustainable organic local food sources that compete with factory farming ag giant corporations. It is about limiting information for consumers about health benefits of wholesome foods (ie walnuts and cherries for example) and about allowing the FDA to eliminate access to dietary supplements as has just been done in
europe. I have written the Senate MANY times in OPPOSITION to this bill as written and its similar bills. We do desperately need a true food safety bill that will actually reform the dirty CAFO feeding operations that are the primary source of massive food contamination, but this bill IS NOT IT.
Why are supporting a horrible bill written by Big Ag it puts an end to farmer’s markets and seed collection. We wont even be able to give produce to friends & neighbors. This bill is all wrong nothing is better than something horrible.
Steve,
I’m with you on the pressing need to control not only big factory farms but also the possibly worse Agri-businesses/pharmaceuticals, such as Monsanto, Syngenta etc. with their toxic herbicides, insecticides, fertilisers, GM plants and diabolical one-off seeds that spell penury to small farmers. But not one politician has the guts to challenge them, since their immense wealth and power crushes all opposition.
S.510 should *only* be passed if it includes the amendment to exclude small family farms from requirements that would put them out of business. Big factory farms are where the problem is and they need to be monitored (and can afford to deal with the requirements) – not small farms.
make our food safe
Dear Madam!
Please have S 510 go through because Democracy and American’s well-being is crucial for my country.
Thanks,
Rajan Varma
4411 Rockland Place
Montrose, CA 91020
How was the issue of small farmers been “addressed” with the amendment? I have a small back yard flock of 125 free-range layers with 24/7 access inside or outside their house. My birds are fed a special diet containing no animal or poulty by-products. I have been selling my eggs for over 10 years 52 weeks/year. Because of their access to grass and sun shine, free range eggs are often higher in needed nutrients, such as Omega 3, and considerably lower in fats than commercial caged birds. If you go to my web link, you will see pictures of my chickens and farm animals. Any position taken against what many others and I are doing in the name of food safety is one in favor of keeping 4 birds per cage for their entire life – big business. The incompetence of the USDA in cited instances has little to do with new and better food safety laws but a ruse for “bigger” and “better” government.
Frank asks how the needs of small farmers have been addressed. The Tester-Hagan amendment, which is now part of the bill, exempts any farm or food processor who has sales of less than $500,000 a year, and sells either direct to the individual consumer or to stores and restaurants within a 275 mile radius. Because those and other clauses protecting small farmers have been added, the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition now supports the bill. I’m guessing that Frank would qualify for that exemption. The eggs sound delicious.
Ms Halloran
I am writing my senior thesis at Reed College about the debate over current food safety regulations. Your comments and active role in this debate and with consumers union is very interesting to me.
I have looked around on the internet for an e-mail address I might be able to contact you with but have been unsuccessful. I would love for an opportunity to interview you about your experiences in writing/blogging about sb510.
If this is something you’d be willing to agree to, please e-mail me @ chapmanc@reed.edu. I would be very appreciative if you could give me your time for a short interview in Brooklyn. Thank you.
Christopher,
If you are able to conduct your interview with Ms. Halloran would you please provide the highlights (and low lights). I understand this would be for your paper and therefore you should not provide everything but I am interested solely in the interview. Thank you and the best of luck with your thesis.
Respectfully, Frank
Frank
I appreciate your interest however, due to a variety of rules regarding human subjects research, redistributing imaterial from interviews is something that I swear against. In fact, any transcripts or recordings will be kept in a locker and ultimately erased after the thesis publication.
That being said, I would be willing to add you to a list of people I will be sending my published thesis to in may. The thesis aims to rethink food safety regulation in ontologically new terms that would open up space for radical agro-food movements like many of the new fsmall farms that would be hurt without the tester amendment
How many more people have to die or suffer life-long consequences from eating food that is contaminated with everything from rat feces to human waste to chemicals and unknown substances of all sorts before Wasington gets the message?
What is your bottom line, folks? Is it when a member of your own family is sickened or killed by this careless handling of our food supply? Or is when a member of Congress is taken away in an ambulance and left on life support from eating some of the poison that now infests all our food?
Get out of bed NOW! with the chemical manufacturers and distributors, the huge factory farms, the reckless processing companies and all the rest of the uncaring, greedy contributors to our national health crisis. Return their campaign contributions and get out in front of the next food borne illness or widespread recall of long trusted items like peanut butter or baby food before anyone else has to die.
Your neglect of your duty to your constituents and the nation are being duly noted in your districts as well as the rest of the world. We can tell whom you are really serving, while we are served garbage quality products with misleading labels, poor nutritive values and questionable origins.
Happy Thanksgiving and have a safe and healthy meal with your loved ones this weekend! I hope the rest of us do, too.
I agree that our food supply chain must ensure safe food for all of us. However, laws to ensure our food is safe are already on the USDA books and federal law.
This bill will further support big Agri-businesses while giving the impression the government is helping us. An example of such big business is the table egg industry. Those corporations permit egg farms to stuff 4 mature chickens into a small cage, with a WIRE CLOTH bottom of about 12″ x 12″ for the remainder of their lives. Never to see sunlight, never to touch the earth, or eat a bug or grass. Their toenails are long because of never scratching, which is natural to a chicken. The birds generally have their combs cropped and their beaks cut short as day old chicks to later prevent cannibalism. They are in climate-controlled houses and provided feed and water automatically sometimes up to 5, 6, or more rows high. Google “chicken layer house” and see the images for yourselves. Moreover, small farmers with backyard flocks had to be exempted! Animal welfare has a part in our food safety chain.
If the USDA were doing their jobs, the Midwest egg and Eastern peanut butter food outbreaks most likely would have been prevented.
I have heard this bill will also affect everyone of us with a home garden. Why will I not be able to share my veggies with my neighbors? Is this true Ms. Jean Halloran? Can you imagine buying your fresh produce and groceries from government outlets without competition?
Like every bill this Congress passes, the title is exactly the opposite of what it says. The so called Food “Safety” Bill will make it more possible to eat contaminated food by eliminating the small farmer in favor of big agri farms which tend to bribe local “inspectors” to look the other way. Expect more tainted food not less.
It puts all US food and all US farms under Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, in the event of contamination or an ill-defined emergency. It would end US sovereignty over its own food supply by insisting on compliance with the WTO, thus threatening national security. It would allow the government, under Maritime Law, to define the introduction of any food into commerce (even direct sales between individuals) as smuggling into “the United States.” It imposes Codex Alimentarius on the US, a global system of control over food.It would remove the right to clean, store and thus own seed in the US, putting control of seeds in the hands of Monsanto and other multinationals, threatening US security. It includes NAIS, an animal traceability program that threatens all small farmers and ranchers raising animals. It extends a failed and destructive HACCP to all food, thus threatening to do to all local food production and farming what HACCP did to meat production – put it in corporate hands and worsen food safety.It deconstructs what is left of the American economy. It would allow the government to mandate antibiotics, hormones, slaughterhouse waste, pesticides and GMOs. It uses food crimes as the entry into police state power and control.
Shame on Consumers Union for backing this really bad legislation.
Update: There is a very good chance this bill will be voted upon tomorrow, Monday 29Nov, because of the cloture petition presented on the bill 18Nov.
Sen Durbin, Dick (IL) sponsored bill SB510
These senators are co-sponsors and when they signed on as a co-sponsor.
Sen Alexander, Lamar [TN] – 3/3/2009
Sen Bingaman, Jeff [NM] – 11/18/2009
Sen Burr, Richard [NC] – 3/3/2009
Sen Burris, Roland [IL] – 6/24/2009
Sen Casey, Robert P., Jr. [PA] – 9/21/2010
Sen Chambliss, Saxby [GA] – 3/4/2009
Sen Dodd, Christopher J. [CT] – 3/3/2009
Sen Enzi, Michael B. [WY] – 11/30/2009
Sen Gillibrand, Kirsten E. [NY] – 10/14/2009
Sen Gregg, Judd [NH] – 3/3/2009
Sen Harkin, Tom [IA] – 11/30/2009
Sen Hatch, Orrin G. [UT] – 11/9/2009
Sen Isakson, Johnny [GA] – 3/3/2009
Sen Kaufman, Edward E. [DE] – 9/13/2010
Sen Kennedy, Edward M. [MA] – 3/3/2009
Sen Klobuchar, Amy [MN] – 3/4/2009
Sen Menendez, Robert [NJ] – 9/13/2010
Sen Nelson, E. Benjamin [NE] – 6/16/2010
Sen Udall, Tom [NM] – 7/28/2009
Sen Vitter, David [LA] – 5/27/2010
Senate has just voted, 73-26, in favor of S.510
Enjoy your fascism!
A smaller you-for a bigger government!
Our senators tried to sneak this though Sunday night. The are sticking it in another bill to help pass it against the people
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/750/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=5407
Vote against anyone who voted for this bill!